Unreported corruption is the biggest problem, measures of the state so far without success
Transparency Serbia presented the results of the Global Corruption Barometer 2015/16 for our country
At least 374,000 undiscovered cases of bribery for obtaining the services of the public sector or the protection from penalty, occur In Serbia annually. These are the data arising from the survey Global Corruption Barometer 2015/16, which were unveiled today by the organization Transparency Serbia (official chapter of a global network Transparency International). At the same time 220 criminal charges are raised annually for accepting and giving bribes and for abuse of public office, around 3,000, which is a hundred times less than the number of cases of petty corruption indicated by this research. These findings confirm that the priority for Serbia must still remain revealing of a large number of corruption cases. Research also suggests that measures taken by national authorities, through periodic campaigns of arrests and implementation of strategies and action plans have not made substantial progress. This goal can be reached only if the prosecution undertakes credible investigations of all suspicions of corruption and inform the public about the outcome and if a potential whistleblowers and witnesses of corruption are sure that they will not suffer harm, which currently isn’t the case.
Research of the direct experience of citizens with corruption (cases when citizens paid a bribe so-called "petty corruption") was focused on eight sectors (or institution): traffic police, public health, educational system (two categories), the courts - civil litigation, public services that issue official documents (e.g. passport, copies of official records, registration), the departments responsible for unemployment benefits and other benefits under social security.
A total of 68% respondents had contact with some of the observed institutions, out of which 22% of them (or household members) gave the bribe at least once in the past year. When these percentages are transferred to the total number of households in Serbia (census from 2011), we reach the minimum number of 374,205 cases of petty corruption on an annual basis, while the real one is probably much higher.
On the other hand, on an annual basis, according to the latest available data (2014) for criminal act of abuse of public office 3014 people were reported, 142 for accepting of bribe, for giving of bribe 84, 33 for trading with influence and 79 for abuse related to public procurement. In the same year 1044 persons were accused of corruption.
This means that less than 1% of criminal acts of corruption is ever reported, and that the number of accused and convicted is far less!
Given the fact that large number of citizens comes into contact with them, the most bribery cases were registered related to the traffic police and health services. As much as 31% of those who had to deal with the traffic police in the last year, claims to have paid bribes. Health and various departments that issue permits and approvals follow with 14 and 12% of bribery, which is better than the status in a similar study from 2012, but still lower than in the barometers from the previous period. It should be noted that 50% of the surveyed had contact with the healthcare, and with agencies that issue permits 21% of the population.
Citizens, according to the survey, believe that the fight against corruption is more important than it is to those in power. They classified the fight against corruption among the three most important tasks for the government. Namely, unemployment is in the first place (52%), followed by the economy (50%), corruption (39%), crime (38%) and healthcare (25%).
On the other hand, the importance given to the fight against corruption in the government's plans, drops (exposé of the Prime Minister in August 2016 compared with those from 2014, 2013 -Reconstruction, and especially 2012).
It is not surprising that perception of progress in the fight against corruption is reduced. While more than a quarter of citizens consider that there is less corruption now than it was four years ago, 40% of them are convinced at the opposite. Nearly one-third does not provide a clear answer to this question.
In the last round of the Barometer (2012/13) there was a sudden jump in optimism after the change of the Government. More than half of the respondents then were confident that the situation is better than in the past. Now, the number of those who believe that progress has been made compared to the situation in previous years, that there is less corruption, halved (26%), while as many as two-thirds of citizens believe that progress has been made. However, the percentage of respondents who were satisfied with the results in the fight against corruption is still significantly higher than it was in 2009 and 2005 (13%).
Number of people who are dissatisfied with the performance of the Government in the fight against corruption is much higher than the number of those who consider executive power successful (44% vs. 28%). Only 2% of respondents considered the Government successful in this activity, while 11% were very dissatisfied. Citizens traditionally assessed that the Government poorly conducts fight against corruption. The current score, even though very low, is one of the best, with fewer than fifty percent share of negative comments and second best "average grade" for the government in the global barometer (after 2007).
The study provides answers to the question why people do not report cases of corruption. Namely, it is obvious that the current anti-corruption policy, including the adoption of the Law on Protection of Whistleblowers and proclaimed "zero tolerance", hasn’t brought results. State authorities have failed to convince one third of the citizens in the basic issue - they will not suffer damage if they report corruption (24% do not report corruption for the fear of the consequences, and 6% for the fear that it will mark them as bribe-givers). The next third, the state authorities failed to convince that they will actually examine the cases of corruption reported to them (17% not reported because it is "difficult to prove corruption," 10% because "nothing will be done" and 2% because they believe that "officials to whom the corruption should be reported are corrupted themselves"). Finally, one quarter does not even know to whom and how to report corruption.
Results related to the percentage of people willing to report corruption do not give cause for optimism. A third of citizens believe that "ordinary people" can contribute to the fight against corruption, and about the same number considered a moral obligation to report corruption that they witnessed. Only 21% of citizens believe that the reporting of corruption is "socially accepted", which does not look promising for the whistleblowers.
Presentation graphic with the findings is available on the website of Transparency Serbia on page Research on corruption/GCB http://www.transparentnost.org.rs/index.php/sr/istraivanja-o-korupciji/globalni-barometar-korupcije-gcb
Recommendations of Transparency Serbia on the basis of the research:
• Conduct credible investigation of all reported cases of suspected corruption and publishing of the results
• Proactive acting of the prosecutor's office (on the basis of available reports and data, without waiting for the criminal complaint)
• Amendments to the Criminal Code (exemption from liability of the person who reports corruption, refinement of existing corruption offenses) and amendments to the Law on Protection of Whistleblowers (whistleblowing of classified information, awards in cases of direct benefit for the budget, numerous refinement of provisions)
• Informing potential whistleblowers and witnesses about the mechanisms for corruption reporting and protection
• Undertaking of systemic changes based on investigated cases of corruption (changes in regulations and practices)
About the research
• Global Corruption Barometer, which was designed by Transparency International, is being implemented in cooperation with TNS since 2003. Data processing is performed by the research sector of Transparency International, and the interpretation for Serbia and comparisons by Transparency Serbia.
• The Global Corruption Barometer is the world's largest study on the experience of citizens with corruption, the perception of citizens about the corruption of individual institutions and their willingness to engage in the fight against corruption
• In Serbia, the field research was conducted in the period from 26 November 2015 until 22 February 2016 at the national sample of 1,508 respondents representing the whole population (central Serbia and Vojvodina). The survey was conducted by CAPI method of "face to face".
Transparency Serbia
Belgrade, 20 September 2016.
News
Presentation of the Local Self-Government Transparency Index - LTI 2024 - The Most Transparent Municipalities and Cities in Serbia
The Embassy of Switzerland in Belgrade - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and Transparency Serbia will present on October 24, 2024 the results of the LTI 2024. TS assessed and ranked the transparency of all 145 municipalities and cities in Serbia based on 95 indicators,. The presentation of the results…
... detaljnije ...PrEUgovor Commentary on the Reform Agenda of Serbia in the "Fundamentals" Area
Coalition prEUgovor regularly monitors the state of affairs and advocates for substantial reforms in Cluster 1 (“Fundamentals”). In its commentary, it shares its impressions of the document - newly adopted Reform Agenda of the Republic of Serbia, in principle and in selected areas it monitors within the Fundamentals. For 21 measures within the section…
... detaljnije ...Missed opportunities for the prevention of corruption within the executive authority and the police
GRECO's assessment that Serbia has fulfilled only one of the 24 recommendations from the fifth round of evaluation in two years calls into question the existence of strategic commitment and will to combat corruption, but also confirms the findings of the TS from the beginning of this year. The lack of…
... detaljnije ...Conference: How to prevent waste of public resources
Transparency Serbia (TS) and the Center for Investigative Journalism of Serbia (CINS) invite you to the conference: How to prevent waste of public resources Belgrade, Tuesday, 9 July 2024, 10.00 – 12.00 Envoy Congress Center, Gospodar Jevremova 47 Agenda: 10.00 – 10.05 Nemanja Nenadić, Program Director, Transparency Serbia 10.05 – 10.10 Milica Šarić, Director…
... detaljnije ...Serbia remains among the countries with limited budget transparency
Serbia ranks 55th out of 125 countries in the Open Budget Index (OBI) with 51 points out of a possible 100, which labels it as the country with "limited budget transparency", according to Transparency Serbia. Progress of five points compared to the previous survey (from 2021) was achieved solely due to…
... detaljnije ...Proposals for the implementation of ODIHR recommendations and improvement of election conditions
Transparency Serbia has used the opportunity to present to representatives of parliamentary parties and the Working Group of the Government of Serbia for Cooperation with ODIHR a number of specific proposals and priorities for improving election conditions, especially regarding the financing of the election campaign and preventing the misuse of…
... detaljnije ...TS submitted proposals to the Assembly for the implementation of recommendations from the ODIHR report
Transparency Serbia submitted to the Serbian Parliament and the Government Working Group for the Improvement of the Electoral Process proposals regarding the implementation of certain recommendations from the Final ODIHR report after the December 2023 elections and unfulfilled recommendations after the previous elections. TS informed the ODIHR Observation Mission, the citizens…
... detaljnije ...Ministry of Interior should publish data on migration of voters that it submitted to Prime Minister
The claim of the Prime Minister in the technical mandate, according to which "everyone can check" in how many cases citizens change their residence, not only does not correspond to the factual situation but is directly opposite to the official answer that Transparency Serbia received from the Ministry of Internal…
... detaljnije ...Corruption prevention in the executive branch - useful GRECO recommendations have not yet been implemented
If Serbia were to implement the recommendations it received in March 2022 from GRECO (Group of Countries for Combating Corruption) – a body established by the Council of Europe – it would significantly improve the mechanisms for combating corruption in the work of the executive. However, very little has been…
... detaljnije ...ODIHR calls for improvement of campaign finance rules and prevention of abuse of public resources "well in advance of the…
In the final Report on the December elections, the ODIHR observation mission confirmed some of the findings of Transparency Serbia's monitoring of the election campaign, and a large number of recommendations refer to unresolved issues of election campaign financing, misuse of public resources and participation of public officials in the…
... detaljnije ...
The costs of the Belgrade local election campaign - what is shown and what is missing
Although there were 14 election lists in the Belgrade local elections, and the deadline for submitting the final financial reports expired six days ago, only nine lists have been published so far. According to the information published on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website, the report on the…
... detaljnije ...Procurement for EXPO 2027 - no minimum deadlines and no legal protection
The Government of Serbia adopted a decree which, in accordance with the lex specialis, prescribes how procurement will be carried out and jobs awarded for EXPO 2027. Nemanja Nenadić from Transparency Serbia for N1 says that the differences between the rules prescribed by the Law on Public Procurement and this…
... detaljnije ...Serbia continues to fall on global list of Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index
In Serbia, there is no political will to reduce corruption; the Government bypasses laws on public procurement, passes special laws for multimillion-projects that are important to it, does not adopt an anti-corruption strategy, and is increasingly distant from the rule of law. It was said at the Transparency of Serbia…
... detaljnije ...TS calls on MIA and HPPO to publish additional information on their actions regarding election irregularities
The information presented to the public by the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA), the Ministry of State Administration and Local Self-Government (MSALSG), as well as the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (HPPO) in Belgrade, regarding allegations of illegality in the electoral list and vote buying, are not sufficient to dispel publicly…
... detaljnije ...Alarm over indications of serious election breaches
Transparency International urgently calls on the Serbian authorities to investigate potential abuses of public office and resources by the ruling party during the 17 December elections. It is also crucial to swiftly determine whether vote-buying took place. The prosecution and the Agency for Prevention of Corruption (APC) need to promptly…
... detaljnije ...In the election campaign, blurred line between state and the party - a sharp and valuable report by ODIHR
The observation mission of the ODIHR already in the preliminary Report highlighted not only the shortcomings of legal solutions but also numerous severe violations of the law during the campaign and election day, among which are problems for which Transparency Serbia has been proposing concrete solutions for years. The International Election…
... detaljnije ...Unfulfilled obligations and priorities for the fight against corruption
The International Anti-Corruption Day, 9 December, is a good reason to call on the Parliament and the Government, which will be formed after the upcoming elections, to finally adopt one of the most effective mechanisms for the fight against corruption - the introduction of illegal enrichment, as a criminal offence…
... detaljnije ...EC report – benevolent conclusion on progress and numerous unresolved problems
The European Commission's assessment[1] of Serbia's "limited progress" in the fight against corruption is too benevolent. On the other hand, the EC report is significant, as it points to some of the most important unresolved issues, including direct contracting of procurement for infrastructure projects, illegal acting state in public administration…
... detaljnije ...The work of temporary bodies during the election campaign must be transparent
Transparency Serbia has indicated to the presidents and members of temporary working bodies in 65 cities and municipalities that they have an obligation to ensure the publicity of their work by allowing journalists to attend the sessions and publishing the explanations for the decisions they make. Based on the Law on…
... detaljnije ...Violations marked the introduction to local elections
Information about the fact that the leaders of around 70 cities and municipalities submitted their resignations – meaning their mandate ended – cannot be found on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption website. It means that the assemblies of these cities and municipalities violated the legal obligation. An even bigger…
... detaljnije ...
The amendment to the Law on Electronic Media does not solve the problem of "public officials' campaign"
The provision of the Law on Electronic Media, passed today, even with the amendment that was adopted by the Parliamentary Information Committee – allegedly to fulfil the ODIHR recommendation – does not solve the problems related to the promotional activities of public officials and does not represent the fulfilment of…
... detaljnije ...An amendment to prevent procurement for EXPO 2027 from being conducted without applying the Law on Public Procurement
Transparency Serbia has submitted to parliamentary groups in the Parliament of Serbia a proposal for an amendment to the Special Law on EXPO 2027 that would remove one of the significant corruption risks by obliging the special companies that will be formed for the implementation of the project to apply…
... detaljnije ...Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište the Most Transparent Local Governments in 2023
Novi Pazar, Sombor and Veliko Gradište are the most transparent local governments in 2023 according to the Local Transparency Index published today by Transparency Serbia, with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Since 2015, the Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments…
... detaljnije ...No public procurement for EXPO 2027 project
Works for the construction of the exhibition area for EXPO 2027, facilities for the accommodation of participants and visitors, the National Stadium and supporting infrastructure – the value of which could amount to one billion euros – will be contracted without the application of the Law on Public Procurement, which…
... detaljnije ...Which Local Governments Were the Most Transparent in Serbia in 2023?
On October 13, 2023, Transparency Serbia and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) will present the results of the 2023 Local Transparency Index (LTI). The Index has been measuring the transparency of all 145 local governments and 25 city municipalities in Serbia each year since 2015 and tracks…
... detaljnije ...EPS illegally withholds information
EPS AD (Electric Power Company of Serbia), joint stock company unlawfully withholds essential information from the public about its work and the possible disposing of the assets of great value. Transparency Serbia, since 26 May 2023, has been trying to verify with the Electric Power Company of Serbia the allegations…
... detaljnije ...On amendments to the Law on Prevention of Corruption
The draft amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption[1], presented for public discussion, respond to the GRECO's recommendations for Serbia[2] to a limited extent. On the other hand, it does not contain measures to reduce the scope of the "official campaign" and to increase the capacity of control…
... detaljnije ...The new draft law on the management of state-owned enterprises still needs amendments
The new proposal of the Law on the Management of Public Enterprises Owned by the Republic of Serbia is better than the previously withdrawn one. Still, it also needs to be amended, primarily in the area related to preventing misuse of public resources during the election campaign, transitional provisions and…
... detaljnije ...Corrupt risks of free conversion not taken into account
Amendments to the Law on Planning and Construction carry a high corruption risk because the state is giving up potential public revenues in favour of individual companies and, at the same time, threatens legal certainty and equality before the law. The amendments provide for the free conversion of the "right of…
... detaljnije ...What needs to be fixed in the proposal of the law on the management of state enterprises
Transparency Serbia sent the Government of Serbia, the Ministry of Economy and the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption a detailed analysis of corruption risks and other shortcomings in the draft law on managing business companies owned by the Republic of Serbia (SOE). The proposal for a law on companies owned…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3
