Free Joomla Template by Discount Justhost
Integrity watch Serbia
LTI
Local transparency index - LTI
Local Participation INDEX – LIPA 2025
State of play and anticorruption priorities in Serbia
ALAC
Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres - ALAC

Serbia slips into open backsliding: authorities dismantle even past reform gains

PrEUgovor Alarm report on the progress of Serbia in Cluster 1 – May 2026 is published and presented 

Serbia moved visibly further away from its goal of European Union membership, slipping from stagnation into open backsliding. It is no longer merely a matter of the authorities persistently refusing to fully implement priority reform measures, but of actively dismantling what had previously been praised — albeit imperfect — as a success, such as judicial reform. In order to preserve political control over institutions that had begun to perform their duties despite mounting pressure, the authorities clumsily abandoned the previous simulation of reform efforts and good intentions. This simulation was then revived at full speed through the establishment of new bodies and mechanisms and the drafting of numerous long-overdue regulations. At the same time, the space for public participation in the drafting of legislation and public policies has been systematically narrowed, both normatively and in practice, with this trend paradoxically being formally justified by the need to accelerate reforms within the framework of the European Union accession process.

The Report in full is available HERE.

preugovor kzn 21. maja 2At a panel held at the European House during the presentation of the Alarm Report on Cluster 1, participants concluded that laws are being adopted without meaningful public debate, without consultations with relevant institutions, and without genuine alignment with European standards.

Jelena Pejić Nikić from the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy (BCSP), editor of the report and moderator of the panel, stated that Serbia has begun to reverse reforms that had previously been adopted, pointing in particular to the latest judicial laws.

She assessed that laws are currently being adopted in Serbia that are not aligned with recommendations, international agreements, and European standards. According to her, this may also affect the absence of positive news from Brussels, especially regarding the disbursement of funds from the Growth Plan for the Western Balkans. Pejić Nikić welcomed the EU’s sharper responses to negative developments in the country, while highlighting Serbia’s operational membership in the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) as of May this year as a rare positive event.

Authorities Move to Shut the Public Out of Lawmaking

Nemanja Nenadić from Transparency Serbia emphasized that the authorities, under the pretext of accelerating the fulfillment of obligations arising from the European integration process, are adopting regulations without prior analysis and consultations. “The authorities are doing everything to completely exclude the public from consultations and from the process of fulfilling obligations from the Reform Agenda, while preventing access to planning documents, and EU institutions and member states should react to this,” Nenadić said.

The panel also addressed electoral conditions, which were assessed as deteriorating despite the recommendations of OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). Participants stated that the authorities adopt only those recommendations that do not affect key mechanisms of political control.

Speaking about the financing of election campaigns, Nenadić assessed that the proposed limits are excessively high and further contribute to inequality among political actors. This was particularly evident in the recent local elections, where the ruling party’s reported campaign expenses were between 10 and 50 times higher than those of its competitors, he explained.

Escalating Hate Speech and Political Discrimination

Tanja Ignjatović from the Autonomous Women’s Center assessed that public debates are being concealed from the public and carried out only formally. “The working group for the amendments to the Family Law met only once, and the draft was presented immediately afterward, which indicates that the discussion was not genuine. There was no time for comments to be considered,” Ignjatović stated. She added that although the number of femicides decreased in 2025, it is particularly concerning that the proportion of cases in which violence had previously been reported increased, indicating that institutions are still failing to respond adequately.

The report also points to violations of human rights and a decline in the protection of civil liberties. Ignjatović assessed that hate speech in the public sphere is intensifying, particularly in pro-government media outlets, while pressure on people expressing political opinions is becoming increasingly frequent.

Police Brutality Goes Unpunished — and Is Rewarded

Miloš Jovanović from the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy spoke about the third Draft Law on Internal Affairs, assessing that it further entrenches the politicisation of the police and weakens democratic civilian oversight of its work, to the detriment of human rights and freedoms. He added that BCSP had submitted 48 comments on the Draft Law, of which only six were accepted and five partially accepted — only those preserving more precise wording from the current law. Jovanović assessed that personnel changes within the police demonstrate that it is becoming increasingly subordinated to political rather than public interests.

Jovanović also referred to cases of police brutality, assessing that they most often go unpunished. The report also covers police conduct during protests, local elections and raids on university faculties. “Serbia lacks a strategy for combating organized crime, while prosecutors working on sensitive cases are exposed to pressure and obstruction,” he added, with particular reference to the harmful consequences of the so-called “Mrdić Laws”.

The participants of the panel concluded that the authorities in Serbia do not demonstrate genuine political will to fulfill EU recommendations, but instead seek to create an illusion of progress while avoiding transparency, public debate, and the harmonization of laws with European standards.

The article was prepared by BCSP intern Teodora Podunavac.

preugovor kzn 21. maja

News